“Jack Smith Is the Savior of Democracy”: Smith’s Strategy Sparks Fury as Trump Faces Legal Showdown

Gabriel RomanNov 16, 2023

Minute Read

Earlier this year, Special Counsel Jack Smith sat in complete silence as former President Donald Trump’s attorneys, Todd Blanche and John Lauro, attempted to dissuade him from indicting Trump for actions related to his post-presidential life. Jonathan Karl captured this event in his book. It marks a pivotal moment in the legal saga surrounding Trump. Smith’s team initiated criminal charges against Trump just hours after this meeting.

Special Counsel’s Silent Response

Editorial credit: Jarretera / Shutterstock.

When former President Donald Trump’s lawyers met with Special Counsel Jack Smith, they presented arguments against indicting Trump. Notably, Smith remained silent throughout, not asking questions or commenting. This detail was highlighted in Jonathan Karl’s new book on Trump’s post-presidential life.

The Meeting with Trump’s Lawyers

Editorial credit: Potashev Aleksandr / Shutterstock.

In an intense session earlier this year, Blanche and Lauro engaged with Smith and his team. They aimed to convince Smith not to press charges against Trump for his post-presidential conduct. Karl’s book offers an insightful look into this meeting, detailing the attempts to sway the Special Counsel’s decision.

Smith’s Unspoken Strategy

In a notable display of restraint, Smith chose silence over speech during his meeting with Trump’s attorneys. As they laid out their case, Smith engaged in a silent assessment, taking notes but refraining from any verbal response. This approach highlighted his methodical nature. It is vividly captured in the accounts of the meeting.

Rapid Legal Actions

The calm of the meeting was sharply contrasted by the swift legal actions that followed. Within hours, Smith’s team initiated criminal charges against Trump. These charges tackled serious allegations, including obstruction of government processes at Mar-a-Lago and efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election outcome.

Trump’s Criticism of Smith

Editorial credit: Rokas Tenys / Shutterstock.

Trump has not held back in expressing his views on Jack Smith on his Truth Social platform. He frequently calls Smith “deranged,” a term that underscores Trump’s strong opposition. It also demonstrates his frustration towards Smith and the rest of the Special Counsel’s legal moves against him.

Celebrating Smith as Democracy’s Guardian

Supporters of Jack Smith have openly declared him a champion of democracy. One user said, “Jack Smith is the savior of democracy. Lock Trump Up. Make America Safe for Democracy Again.” This clearly shows their belief in Smith’s crucial role in protecting democratic values and their strong support for the legal actions against Trump.

Questioning Trump’s Legal Defense

Some users scrutinized the integrity of Trump’s legal defense. One user said that the lawyers’ primary concern was their payment, with comments like, “Please don’t indict him… We will have to do all this work and never get paid…” This cynicism casts doubt on the commitment and sincerity of Trump’s legal team.

The Strength of the Case

Critics of Trump express unwavering confidence in the strength of the case against him. They assert, “When you have the evidence and the proof of wrongdoing, there is not much left to say when you have a rock-solid case.” It seems that some people have a firm belief in the solidity of the legal evidence and the prosecution’s case.

Allegations of Bias Against Smith

However, some users accuse Smith of being biased. One critic said, “Not surprising, the guy hates Trump. He doesn’t care about the law or a fair trial. If he did, we already know this would be over.” This belief challenges the impartiality of the legal proceedings, suggesting a personal vendetta rather than objective legal judgment.

Trump’s Perceived Lack of Remorse

Other users spoke about an apparent absence of remorse from Trump. One individual said, “They probably never offered any evidence of contrition by Trump.” They claim that this might have influenced the decision to prosecute. This view adds to the narrative of Trump’s alleged disregard for the legal consequences of his actions.

Concerns Over Trump’s Potential Presidency

The prospect of Trump reclaiming presidential power worries some, with one user arguing, “How can anyone in their right mind want Trump for president? If he gets into power, he is going to tear down democracy.” This fear reflects concerns over Trump’s influence on democratic norms and institutions.

Clarification on the Indictment Role

Other users addressed some misconceptions about the indictment process. One user asked, “Doesn’t the Grand Jury Indict? Smith doesn’t indict, correct? The Lawyers plead their cases, and the Jury of Trump’s peers decide based on the hearings and evidence to Indict.” They stressed the role of the Grand Jury, not Smith, in the indictment process.

A Harsher Description for Smith

Some describe Smith’s behavior in more severe terms. One user jokingly said, “Just add an ‘ed’ to the end of stone.’ This user implied a more negative view of Smith’s patient approach during the meeting with Trump’s lawyers. Clearly, to some, they believe that Smith has other motives at play.

Admiration for Smith’s Reserved Approach

Smith’s silence during the meeting was praised by some, particularly those who value discretion. They said, “Respect this man. All intelligent people say very little, while most ignorant people never shut up.” This user applauded Smith’s strategy as a sign of wisdom and deliberate thoughtfulness.

Discussions on Severe Punishments

The topic of capital punishment arises in the context of Trump’s actions. One perspective suggests, “It’s a good thing that Capital Punishment was done away with. Trump would be a prime candidate.” This point clearly indicates the perceived seriousness of Trump’s alleged offenses.

Strong Criticism of Trump’s Presidency

Editorial credit: James Andrews1 / Shutterstock.

One user gave Trump’s presidency some rather harsh criticism. They claimed, “Trump is the worst president ever, and I’ve lived through 13 of them. Throw him in jail ASAP.” This statement reflects a deep-seated dissatisfaction and urgency for legal action against Trump, particularly from someone like Smith.

Support for Smith in Presidential Politics

Surprisingly, some users even support Smith for a future presidential run. They argue, “Jack Smith for president 2028 a real law and order candidate.” This demonstrates that some people admire Smith’s commitment to legal principles and justice. However, not everyone agreed with this.

Harsh Condemnation of Smith

On the other hand, Smith faces severe criticism from others. One commenter described him as “A perfect representation of a goblin, one of Satan’s minions, on a crusade of persecution of an innocent man.” They painted him as an evil and dishonest figure in the legal saga. In their view, he is much worse than Trump.

Suggestions of Retaliation by Trump

There’s speculation about Trump’s potential retaliation. One comment proposed, “When Trump wins the presidential election, he should have a FISA warrant issued and have Jack Smith arrested and detained indefinitely without trial.” This reflects the intense political divide and the potential for future conflict.