“Joe Biden Is the Worst POTUS Ever”: Voters Are Furious Over Biden’s New Policies and Economic Turmoil

Gabriel RomanNov 23, 2023

Minute Read

The recent regulatory changes under President Joe Biden’s administration have sparked widespread debate and concern. These modifications are set to influence a wide range of sectors. These include energy efficiency standards and broader economic policies, which will all have significant consequences.

Impact of Biden’s Regulatory Approach

Editorial credit: Consolidated News Photos/Shutterstock.

President Joe Biden’s tenure has seen significant regulatory changes, particularly through the Office of Management and Budget. These changes are expected to increase regulatory costs across various sectors. This move by the Biden administration signals a shift in policy approach, potentially impacting everything from business operations to consumer prices.

The Discount Rate Debate

The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs’ discount rate is crucial in evaluating the costs and benefits of proposed regulations. This method, not mandated by law but traditionally practiced since the Reagan administration, has undergone modifications under successive presidents, including Biden. The current administration’s approach has sparked debate over the effectiveness and fairness of these regulatory evaluations.

Biden’s Regulatory Formula

The Biden administration has introduced changes to the regulatory cost-benefit analysis formula, arguably favoring more costly regulations. This shift reflects a new perspective on handling uncertainties in regulation. They have weighed immediate costs against long-term benefits, which has raised concerns about the potential economic impact.

Evaluating Energy Efficiency Standards

The Biden administration’s consideration of new energy efficiency standards, such as for dishwashers, exemplifies the balancing act between immediate costs and future benefits. This case highlights the complexity of regulatory decisions. The tangible costs consumers feel today are weighed against the future’s prospective environmental and energy savings.

Reassessing the Value of Immediate Costs

Under the new regulatory guidelines, the Biden administration places less emphasis on immediate economic impacts. This approach suggests a shift towards valuing long-term benefits more heavily, even if it means incurring significant costs in the present. This policy change has implications for how consumers and businesses experience regulatory costs.

Extending the Scope of Imagined Benefits

The Biden administration’s new rule broadens the scope of benefits considered in regulatory analyses. These include hypothetical advantages such as reduced climate change impacts and addressing social justice issues. This expansion of criteria has sparked debate over the validity and practicality of such far-reaching considerations in regulatory decision-making.

Rise in Federal Regulations

The Biden administration’s approach to regulatory analysis will likely lead to increased federal regulations. They have justified this by long-term benefits that critics argue are speculative. This trend raises concerns about the immediate financial burden these regulations may impose versus their projected benefits.

Homeless Advocates Disappointed by APEC Summit Outcomes

Homeless advocates had high hopes for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit to address homelessness and housing issues. Unfortunately, the summit did not result in new funding or shelters. It has left many advocates and those in need feeling overlooked and underserved.

California Democrats’ Approach to Homelessness

The decision by California Democrats to clear homeless encampments, particularly in San Francisco, has drawn criticism. This move is perceived as an effort to impress foreign dignitaries, particularly Chinese leader Xi Jinping. It has been controversial, given the complex challenges surrounding homelessness and the opioid crisis linked to China.

Broad Impact of New Regulations

The sweeping nature of the new regulations under the Biden administration is expected to affect various aspects of everyday life. From household appliances to health insurance, widespread cost increases are anticipated. This highlights the far-reaching consequences of these policy changes.

Potential for Policy Reversal by Future Presidents

The longevity and impact of the Biden administration’s regulatory changes remain uncertain. Future presidents may choose to reverse these regulations, potentially lessening their long-term effects. This possibility underscores the dynamic nature of regulatory policy and its susceptibility to political shifts.

Inflation’s Persistent Rise

Inflation continues to be a pressing concern, with its rate of increase showing signs of slowing but still going upward. The general public is increasingly dissatisfied, with many holding a pessimistic outlook for the future. There are ongoing challenges with managing household budgets during rising costs, with many feeling the pinch in their daily lives.

Public Reactions to Biden’s Policies

The public’s reaction to President Biden’s policies has been divided. Critics have been vocal, with one remarking, “All you blasting Trump. HE WOULD NEVER DO THIS TO AMERICA.” Another comment, “Joe Biden is the WORST POTUS ever,” reflects dissatisfaction and disappointment.

Concerns Over Economic and Personal Freedoms

Critics of the Biden administration have expressed alarm over potential restrictions on economic and personal freedoms. One comment suggests a sinister motive, “Is it to crash the dollar and crash the economy so we have to go digital currency, and a central bank controls everyone’s money?” Another added, “Well, I guess you wouldn’t need a credit card or wallet then.”

Questioning the Media’s Portrayal of Biden’s Presidency

The media’s portrayal of President Biden has been met with skepticism and suspicion. One commenter asked, “Riddle me this. Why is the media still pushing a false narrative that Biden is actually running the executive branch of the government.” To some, there is a difference between Biden’s capabilities and his media representation.

Comparing Biden’s and Trump’s Visions for America

Editorial credit: Evan El-Amin/Shutterstock.

The comparison between President Biden’s and Trump’s visions for America has ignited passionate debate. One observer noted, “Biden keeps doing everything Trump wouldn’t. Biden’s version of making America great again differs from Trump’s.” Others agreed and highlighted an apparent difference in policy and ideology.

Assessing Biden’s Impact on American Prosperity

Concerns over President Biden’s impact on American prosperity and standing are clear. Reflecting on the change in administrations, one commenter said, “In all my years, I have never seen how a President could actually destroy everything we once had that was good and prosperous.” Comparing Biden’s tenure unfavorably to Trump’s, to some, suggests a sense of national decline and dissatisfaction.

Debate Over Regulatory Impact on Housing and Homelessness

One user criticized Biden’s handling of the homelessness crisis. One user said, “That California Democrats would be so willing to snap their fingers and clear homeless encampments just to impress some rich guy.” They argued that Biden had taken a superficial approach to a significant problem. This reaction highlights the public’s growing frustration.