Trump “Has Nothing but Contempt for the USA” – Prominent Lawyer Attacks Trump’s Legal Charade

Gabriel RomanNov 29, 2023

Minute Read

Elias condemned Donald Trump for his ongoing legal battles and attempts to undermine the judiciary. On the “Democracy Watch” podcast, Elias criticized Trump’s approach. He emphasized how Trump threatens the American legal system’s integrity and democratic principles.

Equality Before Law Questioned

In a striking comparison, Elias questioned whether Trump would receive the same treatment if he were a young Black man accused of a minor offense. His remarks highlight a perceived disparity in the legal system. He claims that Trump’s actions and consequences contrast with those typical American citizens face.

Judiciary’s Alleged Bias in Trump’s Legal Ordeals

Elias accused the judiciary of displaying double standards in Trump’s legal proceedings. He said, “The former president is not being treated like any other American citizen or like any other criminal defendant.” This reiterates his views on an imbalance in the legal system, where Trump’s high-profile status may influence the course of justice.

Elias Demands Judicial Reckoning

In a passionate call for action, Elias urged the federal and state judiciary to address and curb Donald Trump’s legal strategies. He expressed, “He is making a mockery of it,” stressing the need to confront these tactics head-on. Elias’s plea is a reminder of the need to uphold judicial integrity, especially under the strain of political and public scrutiny.

Elias’s Firm Stance on Legal Ethics

Elias called for the legal community to take a firmer stance against frivolous defenses. He stated, “And it is about time that the bar crackdown on these frivolous arguments that lawyers are making.” He claims the judges need to treat Trump like any other defendant, reinforcing the principle of legal impartiality.

Controversy Over Judge Wallace’s Interpretation

Elias raised significant concerns about Denver District Court Judge Sarah Wallace’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment in relation to presidential authority. Expressing skepticism, Elias remarked, “I think the judge stumbled.” His comments suggest a deeper unease about potential misinterpretations of constitutional law.

Elias Questions Judge Wallace’s Application of 14th Amendment

Elias found it perplexing and concerning that Judge Wallace would question the applicability of the 14th Amendment to the president. He argued that the Amendment’s anti-rebellion and anti-insurrection clauses should include presidential actions. This stance highlights broader apprehensions regarding the judicial system’s ability to remain objective and legally sound.

Elias Calls for Presidential Inclusion

Emphasizing the critical need for presidential accountability, Elias argued for including the president under the 14th Amendment. He said, “The president is the commander-in-chief and the chief officer of the United States.” His argument stresses the significant role of the president in the nation’s governance and the importance of constitutional accountability.

Elias Points to Intimidation

Highlighting the challenging environment surrounding legal actions against Trump, Elias cited instances of doxing, intimidation, and threats impacting those who oppose the former president. According to Elias, this adverse climate plays a significant role in influencing judicial decisions. This points to a concerning trend where external pressures might affect legal impartiality.

Movement Towards Supreme Court

Elias noted the significant development of Colorado voters appealing to the state’s Supreme Court against Trump’s actions. He remarked, “The Colorado Supreme Court will get the next bite at this.” This progression is crucial in obtaining a definitive legal interpretation of constitutional provisions related to Trump’s alleged involvement in the Jan. 6th insurrection.

Widespread Distrust in Judicial Handling of Trump’s Case

Public sentiment increasingly reflects distrust and frustration regarding the judicial handling of Trump’s legal challenges. Many people express disillusionment, questioning the differential treatment Trump receives compared to ordinary citizens. This growing discontent highlights concerns about the perceived erosion of judicial fairness and equality.

Public Demand for Unbiased Treatment

There is a strong public call for Donald Trump to be treated as any other citizen within the legal system. This demand for equal treatment is fueled by observations of apparent leniency towards Trump, emphasizing a broader desire for justice and equality in applying the law, regardless of an individual’s status or political influence.

Secret Service Protection for Trump

Editorial credit: James Andrews1 / Shutterstock.

The debate over whether Donald Trump should retain Secret Service protection during his legal troubles is intensifying. One user said, “He has forfeited his right to secret service protection, lock him up.” Instead, they called for legal consequences. This controversial issue reflects the broader societal and political divisions regarding Trump’s legal status.

Demands for Justice Intensify

The public’s frustration is clear, with many labeling Donald Trump as nothing more than a criminal. One comment stated, “The orange idiot is a CRIMINAL, nothing else.” Other users shared this idea, reflecting a growing impatience for the day when Trump and his influence are completely removed from the political landscape.

A Tyrant in the Eyes of the Public

Many see Donald Trump as a bully that the justice system is failing to confront adequately. One user argued, “The American justice system is flinching in the face of a bully. The only way to fight a tyrant like traitor Trump is to stand up and face him.” They claim that Trump, armed with secrets of the state and a following of extremists, should be treated like any other criminal.

Equal Treatment Under Law

The public is adamant that Trump should be treated as an ordinary citizen, not a former president. One comment expresses this view: “That’s exactly what I’ve been saying right along. As much as Donnie thinks otherwise, he’s just an ordinary citizen now and should be treated as such.”

Higher Standards for Trump

Editorial credit: Consolidated News Photos/Shutterstock.

There’s a strong feeling that Trump, given his former status and oath to the nation, should be held to a higher standard than other criminal defendants. One commenter said, “He should be held to a higher standard than any other criminal defendant. This guy wants to run the country and has nothing but contempt for the USA.”

The Danger to Democracy

Many view Trump as a direct threat to the nation’s democracy, particularly concerning his continued promotion of apparent election lies. One user said, “Trump, the former president, is a clear and present danger to the nation’s democracy. It’s even more true today as Trump persists with false claims about the 2020 election.”