“It Is Indeed Breast Milk”: Transgender Woman’s Lactation Post Sparks Skepticism Online

Amy LewisNov 21, 2023

Minute Read

In a sensational turn of events that no one saw coming, a trans woman’s bold declaration about her breast milk has set the internet alight! The statement, which many found both shocking and enlightening, has stirred the pot, with celebrities, influencers, and the general public weighing in

The Unexpected Post

@nominal.naomi, a trans woman, shared a surprising piece of news on X, formerly known as Twitter. “Just finished my morning pumping, and I can confirm for you that it is indeed breastmilk,” she tweeted. With these words, she stirred up a conversation. This conversation reached far beyond her followers. It triggered debates and brought attention to the lesser-known topic of lactation in trans women.

Backing Up with Science

In her tweet, Naomi showed confidence. She mentioned, “I can cite peer-reviewed journal articles” to back up her claim, adding weight to her words. This approach brought a scientific edge to the discussion that many people were not expecting.

The Post-Millennial Jab

To defend her stance, Naomi referred to an article written about her in the past, criticizing her wish to breastfeed. She claimed that the peer-reviewed articles “might be too hard for [her critics] to read because [the] Post Millennial is written at an elementary school level.”

Breastfeeding Announcement

Before this tweet, Naomi had already shared her intention to induce lactation. In a tweet, she said, “I am working to induce lactation so that I am able to breastfeed our youngest child.” This announcement laid the groundwork for her later tweets and also helped her followers understand her journey better.

More than Just a Tweet

However, Naomi’s announcement was more than just a tweet. It pointed to a significant scientific topic about induced lactation in trans women. This topic is complex and has been the subject of much debate. But Naomi’s tweet helped to bring the discussion into the public sphere.

The Nutritional Debate

Adding more depth to her claims, Naomi highlighted the scientific analysis of trans women’s breastmilk. She revealed, “The peer-reviewed literature has analyzed the nutritional content,” In fact, she stated, “It was found to be at the expected levels or better, consistent with the literature on induced lactation in cis women.”

The Power of Peer-Reviewed Literature

Peer-reviewed literature plays a crucial role in the scientific community. When Naomi mentioned these articles, she sought to validate her claims. This move sparked further discussions and debates, bringing the topic to a broader audience.

Social Media Responses Roll In

However, as expected, Naomi’s tweet sparked numerous responses. The comments ranged from supportive to skeptical. The polarizing nature of the topic triggered a variety of viewpoints, sparking lively debates on Twitter.

A Doubtful Case Study Mention

A responder to Naomi’s tweet pointed out the limitations of the study. They argued that the study didn’t support Naomi’s claims about the safety or adequacy of trans women’s breast milk. They identified that it was a “single case study, not an analysis of safe breast milk.” This point shows that while some people support Naomi, others remain skeptical.

The Quantity Question

In addition to questioning the study, the responder emphasized the quantity of milk a baby needs. They highlighted that, in the study, the participant “managed 3-5 ounces for a short time.” However, they argued a “baby requires 7 to 10 times that amount,” meaning a trans woman’s breast milk wouldn’t meet a baby’s requirements.

The Hormone Role

Additionally, the commenter mentioned that the case study participant used hormone assistance to produce breastmilk. By bringing this up, they questioned the natural ability of trans women to lactate, adding another layer of complexity to the debate.

The Non-Nutritional Experience

They also brought up the non-nutritional aspects of the study. The responder argued that the study focused more on the experience of lactation than the safety and adequacy of the milk. As such, they suggested the study might not provide a complete picture of the issue.

Safe or Not?

They argued, “The study said this was more about the “non-nutritional” experience. The study did not prove this breast milk was safe or adequate.” They argued more research needs to be done in cases such as Naomi’s to ensure the milk is adequate and safe for a baby to consume.

Overstating the Case Study?

The commenter argued, “The original poster WAY overrepresented a single case study,” implying that Naomi may have exaggerated the study’s findings to support her claims. This accusation added fuel to the fiery debate.

Questioning Motives

Finally, the responder asked, “Why [would] anyone would do that? More about themselves?” They suggested that it might be more about self-promotion than scientific accuracy. This query added a twist to the debate, prompting others to question Naomi’s motives.

A Range of Reactions

The responses to Naomi’s tweets were diverse. Some people supported her and congratulated her on breaking new ground in trans healthcare, while others doubted her claims. Clearly, this is a rather controversial topic.

The Unending Discussion

Naomi’s tweets brought the issue of lactation in trans women into the spotlight. The debate sparked by her posts continues, leaving more questions than answers. Despite the disagreements, these discussions are important for raising awareness and understanding.