“Christian Prudes Declare It Immoral” – DeSantis’ Drag Show Ban Halted by Supreme Court

Gabriel RomanNov 29, 2023

Minute Read

Recently, the Supreme Court has intervened in Florida. They halted Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and his enforcement of a law regarding drag shows. This legal development touches on broader themes of LGBTQ+ rights and the bounds of the First Amendment, particularly regarding freedom of expression.

Governor DeSantis’ Vision

Image Credit: The Old Major/Shutterstock.

Governor Ron DeSantis’ has made a legislative push to establish what he describes as a “citadel of normalcy” in Florida. His law, specifically targeting drag shows in venues accessible to children, has become a divisive topic. It is part of DeSantis’ broader cultural agenda and reflects his stance on what he perceives as appropriate public entertainment.

The Law’s Implicit Aim

The Florida legislation, though not explicitly naming drag shows, evidently targets these performances. It penalizes venues that allow children to witness what is deemed “adult live performances.” The law’s critics argue that it employs ambiguous language to regulate a specific form of entertainment.

Hamburger Mary’s Legal Leadership

Image Credit: The Image Party/Shutterstock.

Hamburger Mary’s in Orlando has been at the vanguard of the legal opposition to this law. They argue that the law’s ambiguous phrasing infringes on First Amendment rights, threatening the essence of artistic expression. Their argument focuses on the broad and unclear language of the law, which they assert could be used to unjustly target a range of artistic performances.

Hamburger Mary’s Family-Oriented Approach

Hamburger Mary’s emphasized its identity as a family-friendly venue. Their legal representatives argue that the establishment offers a space where families can collectively experience a diverse range of entertainment. They challenged the assumption that drag shows are exclusively adult-oriented. This stance highlights the venue’s commitment to inclusivity.

Upholding Freedom of Speech

Editorial credit: Christopher Penler/Shutterstock.

In a significant legal victory for Hamburger Mary’s, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, along with the federal district court, ruled against the Florida law. These courts identified the potential violations of free speech, suggesting that the law could set a dangerous precedent. This shows the importance of protecting artistic and expressive freedoms against legislative actions.

Supreme Court’s Focus on Procedure

The Supreme Court chose to concentrate on the procedural elements of the case rather than explore the First Amendment implications. This decision leaves a gap in the constitutional debate surrounding such laws. It implies that future judicial interpretations could still significantly impact the landscape of artistic expression.

Reaction from DeSantis’ Office

Jeremy Redfern is a representative for Governor DeSantis. He voiced the administration’s disappointment following the Supreme Court’s ruling. However, he maintained an optimistic outlook regarding the future of the law. He claimed that the Court’s decision did not address the core merits of the legislation.

Community Support for the Legislation

Some Floridians have expressed approval of the law’s objectives. They claim they want to protect children from exposure to adult-oriented themes. This support highlights a concern among some groups about the suitability of certain entertainment forms for young audiences. It is part of wider debates over public morality and the role of parental guidance.

Advocacy for Artistic Freedom

Opponents of the law champion the cause of artistic and expressive freedom, arguing against any form of censorship. Advocates for artistic liberty view the law as a potential threat to the richness and diversity of cultural expression. They argue for the need to resist legislative encroachments on creative freedoms.

The Broader National Conversation

The legal battle in Florida has sparked widespread discussions across the United States. The debate includes larger themes about balancing the need to protect children and uphold freedom of expression and artistic creation. This national conversation reflects the complexities of navigating societal norms, parental responsibilities, and individual rights.

Consequences of Law Enforcement

Should the law be enforced, it poses significant risks for venues and individuals, including substantial financial penalties and the potential loss of liquor licenses. These could have serious effects on the livelihoods of business owners and performers. The threat of such penalties raises concerns about the economic and personal costs of obedience.

Historical Comic Tradition vs. Moral Outrage

Critics of the law highlight the historical context of men dressing in women’s attire for humor. One user said, “Men have been dressing up as women for centuries as a comic routine. Suddenly, the Christian prudes declare it immoral. It’s their bigotry that is the problem.” This viewpoint suggests that the current backlash concerns cultural and religious biases rather than genuine moral concerns.

Protect Kids or Censorship?

The debate around the Florida law includes voices calling for the segregation of drag shows to adult-only venues. One Floridian expressed, “You want your drag shows, that’s fine. Have them in bars… leave the kids alone.” This sentiment reflects a segment of the population that sees the protection of children from certain themes as necessary.

Satirical Advice to Governor DeSantis

In a humorous take on the situation, a comment aimed at Governor DeSantis suggested, “You know Ron, if you don’t like DRAG SHOWS, just wear a dress, wig, and makeup, then no one will recognize you the next time you attend one. Oh, ditch the white boots too. Don’t fight it, Ron. You know you want to go.”

Political Ambitions Under Scrutiny

Governor DeSantis’ approach to this issue has led some to doubt his potential for national leadership. As one critic said, “Could you imagine this idiot as President? No!” To some users, his focus on divisive, cultural issues may not translate well to a larger political stage, where a more inclusive and unifying approach might be necessary.

Calls for Focus on More Pressing Issues

Some critics argue that Governor DeSantis should focus on more critical issues facing Florida and the nation. One such comment was, “Perhaps DeSantis should focus on issues like the insurance industry problems in Florida and health care for the nation’s security. That would be better than a divisive policy that does not advance the country.”

Reaction to Governor DeSantis’ Political Record

Governor DeSantis’ legislative record, particularly regarding this law, has drawn considerable criticism. As one observer noted, “All of his laws have been rejected. He is bad for politics.” This strong condemnation reflects a broader view of dissatisfaction with his political approach. Some critics view his initiatives as consistently against public approval.

Addressing Broader Moral Concerns

The focus on drag shows has been contrasted with the apparent tolerance of other adult-oriented establishments in Florida. One commentator pointed out, “He’s going after drag shows. But a drive-up Hwy 19 from Clearwater to Springhill has about 20 strip clubs and or lewd shops that have been there for 20 years. Does that have no influence on morality? At least Hamburger Mary is not an offensive name for a facility.”