“The Only Friends Donnie Has Are Liars and Cons”: Trump’s Golfing Cronies Called Out in Legal Showdown

Gabriel RomanNov 23, 2023

Minute Read

Recently, Attorney General Letitia James criticized the defense team in Donald Trump’s ongoing $250 million civil lawsuit. James is spearheading the prosecution. She took a critical stance on the qualifications and objectivity of Trump’s defense witnesses, particularly highlighting their personal connections to Trump.

Attorney General’s Social Media Commentary

Attorney General Letitia James expressed her views, targeting Donald Trump’s defense in his current legal battle. She characterized the defense as less of a strategic legal maneuver and more of an assembly of Trump’s golf associates. In doing so, she suggested a lack of professionalism in their approach.

Scrutiny Over Defense Witnesses’ Expertise

Editorial credit: Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.

James raised significant doubts about the defense witnesses in Trump’s lawsuit, specifically questioning their expertise. “We heard testimony from their many expert witnesses, but they weren’t real experts,” James stated. Her skepticism was rooted in their apparent lack of direct experience relevant to the case.

Personal Connections Undermine Witness Objectivity

James highlighted the personal connections between Trump and his defense witnesses, labeling them as long-time friends and golfing partners. “Several of these experts are long-time friends and golf buddies of Donald Trump,” James disclosed. This intimate connection casts a shadow over the witnesses’ impartiality, hinting at potential biases in their testimonies.

Detailed Evaluation of Defense Testimonies

In an in-depth review of the defense’s testimonies, James was openly critical. She carefully explained her belief and outlined the reasons why the statements were unconvincing. Her critique was not only about their lack of relevant experience but also highlighted the bias stemming from their close relationships with Trump. To her, this could compromise the integrity of their testimonies.

Gap in Expertise of Defense’s Accounting Witness

James pinpointed a critical weakness in the defense’s team, focusing on their accounting expert’s lack of relevant experience. “Their accounting expert has never once worked on the types of financial statements at the heart of Donald Trump’s fraud,” she claimed. This revelation raised questions about the depth and applicability of the defense’s expertise.

Concerns Raised by Accounting Expert’s Testimony

Attorney General James highlighted troubling aspects of the testimony from accounting expert James Flemmons. Flemmons pointed out serious issues in Trump Organization documents, labeling one “a red flag.” Furthermore, Flemmons mentioned Trump’s warnings to lenders about the unreliability of certain financial records, which James found particularly telling.

Inconsistencies in Insurance Expert’s Testimony

James called attention to contradictory statements made by the defense’s insurance expert. This inconsistency in testimony, as pointed out by James, further weakened the credibility of the defense’s team. It was another example where the supposed expertise brought to defend Trump fell short under scrutiny.

Defense Witnesses’ Close Ties to Trump

The Attorney General underscored a common factor among the defense witnesses – their close personal connections to Trump. “One has donated millions of dollars to Donald Trump’s campaign, and his son even got married at Mar-a-Lago,” said James. These connections raised concerns about the objectivity and impartiality of the testimonies provided in Trump’s favor.

James Asserts Solidity of Facts Against Trump

Editorial credit: Potashev Aleksandr / Shutterstock.

In her closing remarks, James was firm in her belief that her team had presented a solid case against Trump. “We have presented the facts, and the facts don’t lie,” she confidently stated. She emphasized that despite the defense’s efforts, not one of their expert witnesses could effectively counter the facts laid out by the prosecution.

Criticism of Trump’s ‘Friends’ and Their Integrity

Some users scrutinized the character of Trump’s associates. One user stated, “The only ‘friends’ Donnie has are just like him… liars and cons.” This statement reflects widespread distrust and skepticism about the honesty of those in Trump’s inner circle. Many appear to doubt the credibility of those who support him.

Skepticism About Witnesses’ Golfing Ties to Trump

Others were skeptical about the involvement of Trump’s golf buddies as defense witnesses. One user commented, “The golf buddy witnesses? I would have just had to ask if they had ever seen Trump cheat at golf!” Others agreed, also sharing their disbelief in the objectivity of these witnesses. They believe the witnesses lack integrity due to their personal relationship with Trump.

Harsh Critique of Trump’s Presidency

Editorial credit: Gino Santa Maria / Shutterstock.

Trump’s presidency faces harsh criticism for its alleged self-centered policies and damaging impacts. One user expressed, “All Trump did in four years was give a tax break for himself, spread hate and division, ignore a pandemic, destroy the economy, steal and sell our national secrets, and try to overthrow our democracy. Let’s put him back in.”

Allegations of Vendetta Against Trump by DA

Concerns about Attorney General Letitia James’s motives in pursuing Trump have been raised. One comment read, “Only in America. A DA that got voted into office because she promised to indict Trump. This woman has been out for Trump since 2015. Voters put her in office not because of her merit but because of her promise. A vendetta towards a presidential candidate. Something smells here.”

Satirical Comments on Trump’s Self-Comparison to Divine Figures

Editorial credit: EPG_EuroPhotoGraphics / Shutterstock.

Some uses were sarcastic about Trump’s alleged inflated self-image. An individual joked, “Since The Conald claims to be the Second Coming, was God listed as an expert?” This tongue-in-cheek comment mocks Trump’s self-comparison to divine figures. It highlights the apparent absurdity and overblown ego in such claims.

Concerns Over Trump’s Aggressive Behavior

Fears about Trump’s aggressive behavior and its potential consequences are evident in public opinion. A user stated, “For an innocent person, Trump sure likes to threaten people. He’s liable to start WWIII.” This comment points to a broader concern about Trump’s aggressive style and its possible global peace and stability implications.

Doubts About James’s Legal and Real Estate Knowledge

Some are questioning Attorney General James’s expertise in handling the case against Trump. One user observed, “James doesn’t know law and has no clue about real estate values.” This comment represents a line of skepticism regarding James’s ability to effectively prosecute a case involving complex legal and real estate issues.

Questioning the Selection of Defense Witnesses

The selection of defense witnesses in Trump’s trial has been criticized. A social media user remarked, “He didn’t dare call actual experts… they’d have decimated him.” To some, the defense deliberately avoided calling more credible, knowledgeable witnesses who might not have supported Trump’s narrative.

Calls for Judicial Impartiality and Restrictions

There are also calls for impartiality and fairness. One user pointed out, “I’m not a Trump fan at all, but it seems to me that if the courts want him to shut his mouth about the trials and people involved, shouldn’t the judge have the same restrictions?” There is a clear desire for a balanced approach in the judiciary, ensuring all parties involved are subject to the same standards.