“You Would Literally Give Putin What He’s Stolen”: Ramaswamy Says He Will Make Deal With Putin To Prevent Ukraine From Joining NATO

Amy LewisNov 6, 2023

Minute Read

GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy appeared on the latest episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored. During this appearance, the pair had a heated discussion about Ramaswamy’s foreign policy plans, especially regarding the war in Ukraine. His comments left many, including Piers Morgan, shocked.

Inquiring Minds Want to Know

Morgan asked Ramaswamy, “What would you do about the war in Ukraine?” The latter’s answer was concise and cryptic. “I would do a deal.” Such a brief answer left more questions than answers. Naturally, many people felt curious about the specifics of such a deal and how this could benefit both America and Ukraine.

Pressing for the Fine Print

Editorial Credit: DFree / Shutterstock.com.

Dissatisfied with vague statements, Morgan pressed on for clarity, hinting at comparisons to Trump’s style, “What’s your deal? I mean, you and Donald Trump talk about–” It was here that Ramaswamy interrupted with a promise, “I’ll give you details. In my case, I’ll give you details.” However, he did not reveal what these were.

No Gifts for Putin

Vladimir Putin — Image Credit: plavi011 / Shutterstock.

Morgan continued to seek details. He asked, “You would give Putin what he’s taken?” In response, Ramaswamy gave a somewhat puzzling reply, affirming, “I won’t give, I won’t give him anything. There’s a deal.” Again, it appears that Ramaswamy was either unable or unwilling to share details of this alleged deal.

Clarifying the Enigmatic Response

Editorial credit: Aaron of L.A. Photography / Shutterstock.

Morgan was visibly puzzled by the lack of details. He questioned further, “What would you give him?” Amid the ambiguity, Ramaswamy stood his ground, reiterating with a calm yet firm tone, “I wouldn’t give him anything. I would give him a deal.” His statement suggested a negotiation far removed from the usual political give-and-take, sparking more questions than answers.

Setting Conditions for Putin

Xi Jinping — Image Credit: plavi011 / Shutterstock.

The interview grew more intense as Ramaswamy outlined a pivotal demand for his proposed agreement. “He has to exit his military alliance with Xi Jinping. End the Russia-China military alliance,” he declared. Ramaswamy’s condition appeared to be less about trade-offs and more about reshaping global alliances.

Ramaswamy’s Stance on NATO and Ukraine

The discussion took a strategic turn as Ramaswamy ventured into the complex terrain of NATO’s expansion policies. “And then, in return, what we get is a hard commitment that NATO will not admit Ukraine to NATO,” he asserted. This part of the deal seemed to hinge on a geopolitical compromise that would obey Russian security concerns while possibly ignoring the sovereign wishes of Ukraine.

Discussing the Geopolitical Chessboard

Morgan asked about the territory that Russia has already claimed. Ramaswamy’s response revealed a geopolitical calculation, “The most important part is the NATO part. This is what matters most to Putin.” By suggesting a freeze on current lines, he implied a willingness to accept, at least temporarily, the status quo. This could be seen as controversial.

Morgan’s Reaction to the Land Issue

Editorial credit: Juli Hansen / Shutterstock.

Morgan’s surprise was clear when Ramaswamy implied acceptance of the territorial status quo. To some, this could be interpreted as rewarding aggression. “You would literally give Putin what he’s stolen.” The candidate’s reply, “I’m not giving anything. I’m giving him a deal,” suggested a belief in the power of negotiation over the language of force or condemnation.

Ramaswamy Defines Putin

Editorial credit: Aynur Mammadov / Shutterstock.

The dialogue took a sharp turn as Morgan inquired about Ramaswamy’s personal views on the Russian President. “What did you call Putin?” The response was immediate and blunt, “He’s an evil dictator.” This acknowledgment of Putin’s character seemed at odds with Ramaswamy’s earlier statements on deal-making. It shows a complex stance.

Controversy Over Acknowledging Suffering in Ukraine

The dialogue around Ukraine’s actions was polarized. Some people saw a bias in public discourse, with one person declaring, “We’re not allowed to discuss the tragedies Ukraine has inflicted on its own citizens.” This statement suggests a frustration with what some see as a one-sided narrative that does not account for all aspects of the conflict.

Allegations of Republican Complicity with Russian Influence

Accusations of partisanship mixed with international actions surfaced, as one user claimed, “It seems the Republicans are heavily influenced by the Russian Criminal Oligarchy.” This comment reflects a growing suspicion among certain observers about the depth of Russian connections. They argue this influence is infiltrating Republican ranks.

Critique of Ramaswamy’s Strategic Playbook

However, some users were sarcastic about Ramaswamy’s strategic inspirations: “It appears Ramaswamy’s political knowledge comes from ‘The Art of the Deal.’” The idea was clear. This user doubted the substance behind the candidate’s language, casting his qualifications for higher office in a dubious light.

Skeptical View of a Potential Political Alliance

The prospect of a Ramaswamy-Trump alliance was met with skepticism by one commenter. They argued, “Ramaswamy and Trump, the dream political duo of 2024. Both seem to lack intellect.” They question not only their cognitive capabilities but also their suitability for political leadership.

Questions Over Sincerity in Political Ambitions

Some observers expressed cynicism regarding Ramaswamy’s political intentions. One user said, “Ramaswamy seems to be in the race merely for attention. Considering his candidacy seriously is laughable.” This viewpoint suggests that Ramaswamy’s actions are seen as self-serving rather than a genuine attempt to serve the public.

Disappointment in Republican Representatives

Others aimed their critiques at the state of the Republican Party’s leadership. One disenchanted user: “Why are there so many uninformed individuals representing the Republican party nowadays?” It seems there are broader concerns about the qualifications and expertise of current political figures.

Changing Views on Ramaswamy’s Promise

Some onlookers expressed a sense of betrayal about the evolving image of a once-loved figure: “It’s astonishing how Ramaswamy went from a promising candidate to just another politician.” For some, they feel a loss of hope in a candidate who was once considered a breath of fresh air in politics.

Hyperbolic Fears of Territorial Concessions

Some users were skeptical about the exaggeration in politics. One user asked, “If Ramaswamy were to become president, would he consider returning Alaska to Russia?” This comment underscores the fear that Ramaswamy’s deal-making approach could bring unprecedented compromises.

Debating the Political Compass of the MAGA Base

The MAGA movement’s international leanings were called into question as well. A user said, “Ramaswamy seems to believe the MAGA base wholeheartedly supports the Communist Dictator Vladimir Putin. Is he right?” This points to a dialogue about the actual political inclinations of this influential voter base.

Lament Over Diluted Presidential Criteria

A voice of concern echoed through the political conversation. This highlighted apprehensions about the electoral process: “We can’t allow just anyone to run for the presidency in this great nation.” The plea for rigorous standards reflects a desire to uphold the dignity and seriousness of the nation’s highest office.