“We Should End Birthright Citizenship”: Vivek Ramaswamy Advocates for Deporting Entire Illegal Immigrant Families Together

Gabriel RomanNov 11, 2023

Minute Read

Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy has caused a stir with his views on immigration. He asserts the need to overhaul birthright citizenship. His argument is rooted in the belief that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents should not be automatically granted citizenship.

Influx of Illegal Immigrants Prompts Policy Reevaluation

The current influx of illegal immigrants is not just a trickle but a steady stream, with some days witnessing sharp spikes. The increase has initiated widespread discussions on the current administration’s immigration framework. Critics argue that it fails to adequately deter illegal crossings. They call for tougher entry requirements.

The Call for Stronger Immigration Policies

From small towns to major cities, many are demanding immigration reform. For these individuals, it’s not a question of closing borders but of reinforcing the integrity of the legal immigration process. They call for a system that is both strict and fair, discouraging illegal entry by making legal pathways more transparent and accessible.

Opposition to Open-Door Policy for Illegal Immigrants

The opposition to what is seen as an open-door policy is rooted in concerns over national security, economic stability, and cultural integration. Critics argue that lenient policies towards illegal immigration encourage dangerous journeys. They also argue that these contribute to human trafficking and undermine the rule of law.

Advocates Urge for Secured Borders

Proponents of tighter border security argue that a nation’s borders are a fundamental part of its identity and sovereignty. They push for an approach involving physical barriers, technological surveillance, and increased manpower to prevent illegal crossings. These advocates often cite cases of drug trafficking and illegal entry as evidence of the need for fortified borders and improved enforcement of existing laws.

Economic and Societal Strains Due to Illegal Immigration

Concerns include the undercutting of wages and exploitation of undocumented workers. They also criticize the financial burden posed by the need for additional healthcare, education, and social services. Communities feel the strain when resources are stretched thin, and there is a view that illegal immigration may drive down job opportunities and wages for resident citizens.

Republican Governors Face Legal Hurdles

Governors like Abbott and DeSantis are some of the state leaders taking a stand against federal immigration policies. Their direct actions have ignited legal debates around states’ rights and federal authority. These actions include busing immigrants to sanctuary cities or challenging the transportation of undocumented immigrants within their states.

The Judicial System’s Leftward Shift

Image Credit: Kathy Hutchins / Shutterstock.

Observers have noted a perceived leftward tilt in the judiciary, particularly in immigration rulings that expand protections for undocumented immigrants. This trend has resulted in various district and federal courts issuing injunctions against immigration enforcement measures, which some argue undermines the ability to effectively control illegal immigration.

Growing Dissatisfaction Even in Pro-Immigration Areas

In traditionally immigrant-friendly locales like New York City, the sentiment is shifting as leaders confront the realities of an overburdened system. Public figures who previously championed sanctuary policies now face the logistical and financial challenges of supporting an unexpectedly high number of arrivals. This is part of a broader national reexamination of immigration policies and their local impact.

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Stance Amidst Border Crisis

Editorial credit: Juli Hansen / Shutterstock.

Presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy has called for a firm but fair approach that respects both the law and the human dignity of immigrants. Ramaswamy is positioning himself as a candidate who values legal immigration. He claims that he also recognizes the need for reform to prevent illegal entry.

Ramaswamy Shares His Immigration Vision

In public forums, Ramaswamy has outlined a vision for immigration that includes deporting those who are here illegally. He also claims to prioritize keeping families intact during the process. He stresses the moral need to treat families humanely while upholding immigration laws, which he believes can coexist.

The Complexities of Family Deportation

The proposal to deport families together is difficult, particularly with children who are born in the U.S. to undocumented parents. These children are citizens by the current interpretation of the Constitution. The logistics of deporting families raise questions about the rights of these children and the practicality of such actions.

Ramaswamy’s 14th Amendment Argument

Challenging the conventional understanding of the 14th Amendment, Ramaswamy’s argument confronts the notion of birthright citizenship head-on. His argument is that the current application of the Amendment is outdated. He claims it does not reflect the original intent or the contemporary immigration challenges.

Broad Debate Over Birthright Citizenship

The birthright citizenship debate goes beyond partisan politics. Individuals from various political backgrounds express concerns about its implications. There’s a growing consensus that the policy, as it stands, may not adequately reflect the complexities of modern immigration and citizenship.

Ramaswamy’s Policy Could Impact His Own Family

Some users agree with Ramaswamy’s proposal, saying, “We SHOULD end birthright citizenship.” Another agreed, saying, “It takes citizens to make more citizens, not merely trespassers.” However, some were more critical. Given that his own father is not a U.S. citizen, critics quickly point out that “his family will need to be deported under his policy.”

Constitutional Roadblocks Highlighted by Skeptics

Skeptics of Ramaswamy’s proposal to amend birthright citizenship highlight the formidable constitutional barriers. “The only way he could achieve his goal is to amend the 14th Amendment,” one critic argued. They stressed the clarity of its language and that “Any person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof is a citizen.”

Ramaswamy’s Proposal Seen as a Lawful Answer to a Thorny Issue

While his ideas have stirred controversy, some see Ramaswamy’s advocacy as a “lawful solution to a serious problem for which no viable answer has yet been tried.” Some users want to explore radical changes to the immigration system in pursuit of legality and order. However, it is clear that there are many opposed to Ramaswamy’s suggestions.

The Specter of Birth Tourism and National Security

Editorial credit: chrisdorney / Shutterstock.

Echoing Ramaswamy’s concerns, citizens voice alarm over birth tourism. They believe this could lead to foreign exploitation of U.S. citizenship laws. One user said, “At this point, Russia could move in and take over with the birth tourism in Florida… Latinos aren’t the only ones doing this. China and many other countries look forward to traveling late in pregnancy to drop a bundle on the US.”

The Slippery Slope to Constitutional Erosion Feared

Not everyone is on board with Ramaswamy’s vision, however, with opponents casting his proposals as a dangerous precedent. One critic said, “Ending the Constitution is job one for Fascists that make the other the enemy.” Others echoed this idea. They argue that tampering with birthright citizenship could be the first step on a slippery slope toward undermining other fundamental rights in the Constitution.