“Trump Was a Plague on America” – Critics Claim Trump Might “Cheat to Win” in Chilling Warning

Gabriel RomanNov 8, 2023

Minute Read

Almost a year has flown by since the curtain fell on the Jan. 6 committee’s riveting report, and the buzz has hardly faded. The panel’s ex-members, who’ve since departed the Capitol’s halls, are speaking out. They share a concern that a Trump encore in the Oval Office could rattle the core of American democracy, echoing the tumultuous aftermath of the 2020 election.

Committee Members Voice Concerns

Editorial credit: Rich Koele / Shutterstock.

Adam Kinzinger was formerly at the forefront of Illinois’ Republican representation. He imagined a scenario where, with Trump back in power, a wave of forgiveness could sweep through the ranks of Jan. 6 defendants. In no uncertain terms, Kinzinger asserts, “I think he ends up mass pardoning the January 6th defendants.”

Luria’s Grave Warnings

Elaine Luria presents her perspective with the gravity it deserves, recognizing the threat that a second Trump presidency poses to the nation’s stability. She does not sugarcoat her apprehension, and her analysis is blunt and unambiguous. Luria warns, “Another Trump presidency will test the republic to its limits.”

Murphy’s Doubts on Democracy’s Safety

Stephanie Murphy articulates the collective anxiety that shadows her and her peers, highlighting her skepticism toward the integrity of the potential vice-presidential candidates under Trump. Murphy’s statement cuts to the quick of the issue, cautioning, “He’s going to have a less honest vice president.” She lays bare the peril she foresees in Trump’s selection criteria.

Raising the Alarm Post-Congress

Their legislative megaphones may be behind them, but these former members’ warnings are not subdued by their exit from Congress. As Trump’s indications of a 2024 run become more tangible, their voices are not receding into the silence of retirement or defeat. They remain firmly opposed to sitting silently on the sidelines.

The Committee’s Legacy

For one and a half years, the Jan. 6 committee peeled back layers on the Capitol insurgency and the ensuing quest to overturn the electoral verdict. The panels succeeded in exposing a concerted campaign to destabilize the electoral process. However, some critics accused their hearings of theatrics.

Trump Faces Potential Charges

Editorial credit: Potashev Aleksandr / Shutterstock.

The committee’s efforts culminated in more than just a historical record. They pushed for accountability through legal channels. Trump was confronted with proposed charges, an expansive case compiled from the confessions of insiders and narratives from local authorities. Yet, this push for justice was met with staunch opposition from Republicans.

Exit of Committee Members

Post-midterm electoral shifts prompted an exodus of several Jan. 6 panel members from the legislative arena. Murphy and Kinzinger opted for retirement from political life, while Luria and Liz Cheney saw their congressional service conclude. Their departures have not silenced them. Instead, they continue to voice concerns about the vulnerabilities of democratic institutions.

Books Echoing Warnings

Cheney and Kinzinger channel their advocacy into the literary realm, with “Oath and Honor” and “Renegade” acting as their new pulpits. Through these books, they continue to disseminate their dire warnings about democratic threats. They have reached an audience beyond the confines of Capitol Hill and congressional hearings.

Cheney’s Urgent Messages

Liz Cheney holds nothing back when it comes to expressing her fears for the republic, calling out the danger she believes is posed by Trump with stark honesty. Cheney’s stance is clear as she said, “We have a former president trying to unravel democracy.” Her words underscore a sense of urgency and a call to vigilance.

Kinzinger on Democracy’s Guardrails

Image Credit: Rich Koele / Shutterstock.

Adam Kinzinger draws a vivid analogy in “Renegade,” picturing democracy as a battered roadway, its protective barriers tested and weakened by the events of Jan. 6. He cautions about the precariousness of the situation. He said, “The guardrails of democracy held up… The problem is the weaknesses are there now.”

Murphy’s National Security Perspective

Editorial credit: chrisdorney / Shutterstock.

Stephanie Murphy draws on her defense background to frame the Capitol breach as a warning sign. She sees it as a minor skirmish foreshadowing potentially graver assaults on the nation’s democratic framework. She views the prospect of Trump’s re-election not merely as a political recurrence but as a potential conduit to national security risks.

Murphy’s 2024 Election Fears

From her position in academia, Murphy’s concerns about the upcoming presidential race are clear. She remains deeply worried about Trump’s potential re-entry into the political fray and, more so, the means by which he may secure his position. She fears not just a political return but an underhanded one, stating he might “cheat to win.”

Luria Sees a Constitutional Battle

Elaine Luria maintains a vigilant watch over the evolving political landscape as the 2024 election horizon draws nearer. Luria does not hold back her convictions about what is at stake, and she stresses the gravity of the future electoral contest. She said, “2024 is a battle for the Constitution and the future of the United States of America.

Unyielding Gloom Over Democracy’s Future

Editorial credit: Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.

As the specter of a Trump candidacy in 2024 looms, concern escalates among his critics. Their outlook is darkened by the belief that Trump would once again refuse to acknowledge a defeat. One user said, “What are the chances Trump won’t accept losing again? Clearly, there is a strong fear of a repeat of the post-election chaos of 2020.

Defenders of Democracy or Freedom Phobics?

Critics of the former president interpret the possibility of his return as a dire threat to personal liberties. They claim, “They are scared of freedom and not being in control of everything we do; if Trump gets elected, he will stop it.” This statement reflects a deep-seated concern that a second Trump administration could further polarize the nation and impede the fundamental freedoms that many believe were already under threat during his previous tenure.

Allegations of Hyper-Partisanship Skew Investigations

Editorial credit: mark reinstein / Shutterstock.

Criticism has been leveled at the Jan. 6 committee. Some users are baffled by the perceived discrepancy, arguing, “Regardless of how you feel about the situation, it’s baffling to me we had an entire panel dedicated to finding evidence of Trump’s guilt on Jan 6, but the effort to uncover Biden’s potential fault in influence pedaling is seen as a purely partisan grasping at straws with no precedent.” Other users shared this fear.

Fears of Escalating Political Violence

Editorial credit: Thomas Hengge / Shutterstock.

Alarm bells are ringing louder for those who speculate about the potential for increased violence should Trump be defeated in another presidential bid. One user said, “If Trump loses again, he will call for all of his cult followers not only to march on Washington but to march on all the state capitals and storm them all and demand recounts in all states.” The implication is a nation braced for widespread civil unrest.

Partisan Critique of the Jan. 6 Committee Composition

Editorial credit: a katz / Shutterstock.

The Jan. 6 committee has been branded as an emblem of partisanship by some who argue that its Constitution was inherently biased. One user claimed, “Jan. 6 committee, consisting of all Democrats except for Reps. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., are partisan.” Another user said, “Trump was a PLAGUE on America. The WORST and Most Corrupt President in history. The Crooked TRAITOR belongs in the Super Max w/ El Chapo and the Shoe Bomber.”