“He’s Gone Crazy in His Hatred” – Trump Fires Back at Judge After $10,000 Fine

Gabriel RomanOct 29, 2023

Minute Read

President Donald Trump’s recent remarks about Justice Department officials have once again brought him to the limelight. The former commander-in-chief is currently navigating the murky waters of courtrooms and social media. This unfolding drama, filled with gag orders, fines, and bold accusations, paints a complex picture of the legal system.

Fine Imposed

In a significant move, Judge Engoron decided to put a $10,000 fine against the former president. Trump’s violation of the gag order, designed to limit his public statements about the case, prompted this penalty. Trump expressed his outrage, detailing on Truth Social how he felt targeted.

Unstoppable Trump

Image Credit: mundissima / Shutterstock.

Even after two separate judges tried to silence him with gag orders, former President Donald Trump remains bolf, voicing his criticisms loudly. On his Truth Social platform, he notably remarked about the justice system. He shared his perspective on the unfolding events and criticized the legal system.

Claims of Bias

Editorial credit: Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock.

With a tone of disbelief, Trump argued that the actions against him lacked foundation. He voiced on Truth Social, describing the legal proceedings as a coordinated “witch hunt.” This is not the first time he has made comments like this, suggesting that those pursuing the cases have other motives for doing so.

Engoron in the Spotlight

The relationship between Trump and Judge Arthur Engoron seems filled with tension. After being punished, Trump took to social media. He claimed Engoron has “gone crazy in his hatred” for him. This comment suggests there is a deeply personal conflict in their professional dealings. However, others have said this is merely Trump’s own conspiracy theory.

First Amendment Controversy

Trump’s firm defense of his freedom of speech underlines this entire saga. He argues that these gag orders infringe on his First Amendment rights. He criticized them as attempts to obscure certain deals from the general population. This is an idea he has repeated several times on his social media platforms.

Truth Social Outburst

Editorial credit: Rokas Tenys / Shutterstock.

In a direct response to Judge Engoron’s fine, Trump took to his personal platform, Truth Social, to voice his displeasure. In this post, he stated, “The judge in the New York State AG case refuses to accept the overturning of his decisions by the Appeals Court.” It is clear that Trump feels personally attacked by some of the court dealings.

Unprecedented Events

Editorial credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.

Trump then shared his reaction to what he sees as bias in the legal system. He declared a shocking statement, stating, “This is a first in the history of the State! HE HAS GONE CRAZY IN HIS HATRED OF ‘TRUMP.’” Many people were critical of these remarks, claiming that Trump should not be airing such opinions publicly.

Stand Before the Court

After numerous public remarks, Judge Engoron took action. He informed Trump that he was going to look into his apparent violations of the gag order. This gag order explicitly prohibited discussions about the judge and his associates. So, Trump’s open comments about them would violate this.

Accusations Fly

Editorial credit: mark reinstein / Shutterstock.

However, Trump did not hold back when airing his criticisms of Engoron. In fact, he was quite open with his displeasure. He portrayed the judge as highly biased, remarking that Engoron is a “very partisan judge with a person who is very partisan sitting alongside him, perhaps even more partisan than he is.”

The Puzzling Photograph

Adding fuel to the fire, Trump referenced an image that became a topic of controversy. It showed Judge Engoron’s chief clerk photographed with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Many speculate that Trump used this as evidence of Engoron’s supposed bias against him.

Trump’s Clarification on Cohen

Upon questioning by Engoron, Trump tried to defend himself. He claimed to be talking about Michael Cohen in his comments, not Engoron. Cohen had recently taken the stand, testifying against the former president in a significant case. This was initiated by New York Attorney General Letitia James (D).

Trump’s Views on Engoron’s Clerk

Editorial credit: Joseph Sohm / Shutterstock.

When asked about his personal sentiments regarding Judge Engoron’s chief clerk, Trump openly expressed his belief that she “was very biased against [me].” This response sheds light on Trump’s adamant ideas of prejudice within the courtroom. However, many members of the public argued that the courts have actually been biased towards Trump, not against him.

Public Outcry and Trump’s Rebuttal

Following the imposition of the fine, a clearly agitated Trump took to his Truth Social platform. He posted, “The Radical Left Judge… fined me $10,000 under his so-called gag order.” Trump’s strong feelings, showcased on his platform, underscore his dissatisfaction with the proceedings and the criminal justice system.

Public Voices Strong Opinions

The legal battle stirred many reactions from the public. One individual, voicing their skepticism, commented, “Rich white man who never faced consequences will not face consequences…” expressing doubts about any real repercussions for Trump. Meanwhile, another, perhaps eager for a resolution, shared, “I so hope he goes to jail today….” revealing the heightened emotions surrounding the case.

Upholding Legal Integrity

However, some users found reasons to defend the judge. One particular individual, seeking to provide a balanced view, pointed out, “The Judge is actually playing it by the book, so his defense is iron tight.” This suggests that despite public feeling, some believe in the judge’s strict obeyal of legal protocols.

Casting Doubt on Juror Impartiality

The legal proceedings also provoked concerns about the fairness of the justice system. A commentator noted, “A president of the US has publicly said that jurors in the U.S. are politically affiliated while breaking legal orders.” This highlights growing apprehensions regarding potential biases within the judicial system.

The Debate Over Penalties

Trump’s financial penalty also sparked debate. Critics argue that a $10,000 fine is a mere drop in the ocean for someone of Trump’s financial stature. However, another perspective emerged with a user stating, “But every time he is fined, his cult will send him money,” suggesting that Trump’s supporters may use such incidents to further rally behind him.

Predictions and Theories Abound

Speculation about Trump’s future moves and the consequences of this case are common. One individual wondered about the strategic implications, suggesting, “This will all be used as marketing for his campaign.” Another, looking ahead, raised concerns about potential defense strategies, asking, “How long before Trumpy’s defense team claims Trumpy has dementia?” The diverse range of predictions underscores the unpredictable nature of this unfolding saga.