”Democrats Aren’t Very Bright People” – FBI Chief Faces Tough Questions on U.S. Safety Under Biden

Amy LewisNov 6, 2023

Minute Read

The safety of the United States and its citizens is a topic that’s always on the minds of many. However, recent discussions have thrown this issue into sharp relief. FBI Director Christopher Wray’s response to questions about America’s security post-election has sparked many responses across social media platforms and beyond.

Wray’s Admission on Safety Post-Election

Editorial credit: Consolidated News Photos / Shutterstock.

FBI Director Christopher Wray made a striking admission recently. When pressed about whether America’s safety has been negatively affected since President Joe Biden took office, he indicated increased threats. It’s a serious concern that’s got people talking about the nation’s security measures and the current administration’s role in them.

The Tense Silence Before Wray’s Response

Editorial credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.

An intense moment unfolded when Senator Rick Scott asked Director Wray about the country’s safety since President Biden’s term began. Wray paused for a significant amount of time before responding. This has led to much speculation about the meaning behind that silence. Many people questioned what he was going to say.

Wray Notes Elevated Terror Threats

During his testimony, Director Wray acknowledged that terror threats have indeed become more serious. He emphasized the escalated tensions in the Middle East as a major factor in this rise. Wray emphasized growing concerns for America’s internal security and that the FBI is trying to tackle these.

Sen. Scott’s Question on U.S. Safety

Sen. Rick Scott asked Wray specifically about America’s national security. He asked if the U.S. was safer from foreign terror threats today compared to the beginning of Biden’s presidency. This question aimed to check the effectiveness of the current administration’s policies on national security.

Wray’s Balanced Statement

In response to the tough questioning, Wray gave a measured answer. He admitted that terror threats had increased since the start of Biden’s presidency. However, he was also quick to add that law enforcement throughout the country has taken steps to be moreprepared for such threats.

Senator Scott Critiques Wray’s Reply

Senator Rick Scott was not satisfied with the answer he received. Taking to social media, Scott stressed that Wray’s admission about elevated terror threats confirmed what many feared. They worried the national security of the United States may be at risk, and this conversation indicated these fears were correct.

The Reality of Elevated Terrorism Threats

Wray also shared the FBI’s thoughts about the present reality. He stated clearly that the terrorism threat level has been higher throughout the year. He claimed that the major source of this increase was conflicts in the Middle East. Apparently, these have intensified the danger of attacks on American soil.

Questioning the FBI’s Role

The FBI’s independence was sharply criticized, with one user lambasting, “Then why has the Federal Bureau of Idiots continued to serve as Obiden’s personal Gestapo organization?” The fiery language used portrays deep distrust in the Bureau, alleging that it has forsaken its duty to the people to become a tool for the presidency.

A World Less Safe Under Biden

Echoing widespread concern, one user stated, “Since Obiden has taken office, this entire world is less safe.” This assessment reflects the fear and disappointment some feel towards the current administration’s approach to global security challenges. They believe the national security problems were caused by the Obama and Biden administrations.

Open Borders and Safety Concerns

One user asked a disturbing question: “If you hated the US and wanted to kill as many Americans as possible, would you prefer to have an open border?” This inquiry directly challenges the immigration policies of the administration. It suggests they may accidentally welcome threats.

Biden’s Administration and Vigilance

A stern warning appeared in a post that read, “Stay vigilant folks; Joe Biden and his administration let them in intentionally.” The allegation here is serious. This user believes that the administration’s policies are not just ineffective but intentionally harmful to the United States and its national security.

Wray Accused of Dishonesty

A disheartened voice among the crowd accused, “Normal for Director Wray to avoid or outright lie before Congress.” Such comments indicate a loss of faith in Wray’s ability to present the truth during crucial congressional hearings. Other users echoed this, indicating a lack of trust in government officials.

Silence as a Sign of Deceit

Many users speculated on Wray’s hesitation when speaking. One user suggested, “He went silent, and that means he was debating about whether to lie or not.” The silence that followed the question on national safety is here read as an internal conflict between honesty and the preservation of a narrative.

Call for Democratic Accountability

The discussion turned to accountability with the charge, “Ineffective question – what really needs to be answered is what will democrats do to remedy the situation they created.” There’s a call for real action, along with a contrast drawn with the previous administration’s legacy. According to some, the Trump administration handled national security problems far better than the Biden presidency.

FBI’s Preparation for Congressional Hearings

Some users critiqued the preparedness of FBI officials: “These guys… Wray, Mayorkas, and their ilk should really come to a hearing prepared to answer questions. They can’t even answer about numbers. Yikes!” This points to an apparent lack of preparation on statistical fronts. It raises questions about the officials’ competence in handling data-driven aspects of national security.

Anticipating Blame for Future Attacks

Some users talked about the high stakes of national security. One user said, “We will all know who to blame when terrorists hit their targets. Democrats aren’t very bright people.” This foreboding statement goes further to criticize the intellectual capacity of the Democratic Party, implying a failure to understand or address the complexities of terrorism.

The Call for Biden to Step Down

Other users demanded a change in government. “Joe has to go. Plain and simple.” Here, the call for President Biden’s resignation is tied to an undercurrent of urgency and decisiveness. It appears that some people believe that Biden’s presidency poses a direct threat to the nation’s welfare.

The Complexity of Global Threat Levels

Additionally, some users dissected the broader issue: “That’s a massive question, with elements far beyond the responsibility or jurisdiction of the presidency.” They continued, “Terror levels have always been in a state of flux. Sen. Scott is a more-on.” This critical reaction challenges the oversimplification of global terror dynamics.

The Limitations of Presidential Power

However, there were also those with a more nuanced understanding of these problems. One social media user said, “Biden has no control over the threat levels that occur from overseas. That is the purview of foreign governments and terrorists.” This perspective stresses that the roots of security threats often lie outside the direct reach of the U.S. presidency.