“A Pretty Face Helps When You Are Committing Fraud”: Ivanka Trump’s Trial Testimony Raises Eyebrows

Gabriel RomanNov 13, 2023

Minute Read

The Trump family is currently involved in a significant legal battle. New York Attorney General Letitia James has brought a lawsuit against them. She claims they misled lenders like Deutsche Bank about their company’s financial status to secure favorable loans. One of the witnesses called to the stand was none other than Ivanka Trump.

Ivanka Trump Takes the Stand

Editorial credit: lev radin / Shutterstock.

During a high-profile court session on Wednesday, Ivanka Trump, the eldest daughter of former President Donald Trump, was a key witness. She faced a barrage of questions regarding allegations of fraud within her family’s company. She began her testimony, ready to shed light on these serious accusations.

The Relationship with Deutsche Bank

Editorial credit: alexgo.photography / Shutterstock.

In her testimony, Ivanka Trump shed light on the close ties between her and Deutsche Bank. She spoke of her interactions with Rosemary Vrablic, a prominent banker at Deutsche. Ivanka claimed their relationship was built on mutual trust and respect, which she claims was an example of their long-standing business connection.

Rosemary Vrablic’s Influence

Speaking about Vrablic, Ivanka Trump expressed her deep admiration. She referred to Vrablic’s “formidable” status in the banking world, emphasizing how their relationship extended beyond simple professional exchanges. Ivanka’s testimony suggested a genuine, mutual appreciation between her and Vrablic, which impacted their business dealings.

Financial Dealings with Deutsche Bank

Image Credit: Eric Urquhart / Shutterstock.

Trump discussed the Trump Organization’s extensive financial engagements with Deutsche Bank. These dealings included significant Chicago, Miami, and Washington, DC projects. She outlined how these projects were vital financial ventures, showcasing the depth of the organization’s relationship with the bank.

Memories of Loan Details

Questioned about specific loans, Ivanka Trump confessed to having fuzzy memories. Confronted with emails and contracts from those transactions, she struggled to recollect the details. This lapse in memory was notable, given the importance of these financial agreements, with some claiming that she was simply lying about not remembering.

A Shift in the Case Against Ivanka

Originally named a co-defendant in the fraud case, Ivanka Trump’s status changed following a legal review. Since she ceased her time at the Trump Organization in 2016, the statute of limitations came into play. This led to her exclusion from the list of defendants – however, she was still called upon as a witness instead.

Ivanka’s Role in the Trial

Serving only as a witness in this trial, Ivanka Trump’s testimony is especially significant. She’s the first from the Trump family to undergo such detailed cross-examination in this case. This makes her insights and recollections vital to the proceedings and fundamental to the eventual outcome of this case.

Cross-Examination Details

During the cross-examination, Ivanka Trump emphasized her intimate bond with Rosemary Vrablic and the rest of the team at Deutsche Bank. She recounted instances where this relationship influenced financial decisions. This included opting for loans even when they were not strictly necessary.

Special Treatment from Deutsche Bank

Ivanka talked about how Vrablic’s Deutsche Bank team often brought her family unique investment opportunities. She gave one example of this, describing an occasion when she was approached about a project during a personal moment. This shows the extent of their business relationship.

The Project Decision Process

Editorial credit: Al Teich / Shutterstock.

The Trumps are no strangers to undertaking significant projects. Ivanka spoke about a time when they committed to a multi-million-dollar property renovation. This clearly reflects her readiness to engage in substantial and long-term investments, along with that of her family, as well.

The Defense’s Argument

In defense, the Trump legal team argued that the idea of due diligence lies with the banks in loan dealings. They pointed out that all loans were repaid and often settled ahead of schedule. They challenged the idea that any fraudulent activity had not occurred on their behalf or by the bank.

The Judge’s Ruling

Despite these arguments from the defense, Judge Arthur Engoron let the lawsuit go ahead. He clarified that the Attorney General had the right to pursue the case regardless of whether Deutsche Bank directly sued the Trumps over any misrepresented loan documents. As expected, this did not go down well with the Trump family.

Public Reaction to Accusations of Memory Loss

The public has reacted with skepticism and doubt to the Trump family’s testimony, especially regarding claims of forgetfulness. One observer shared their astonishment, commenting, “It’s amazing that everyone in that criminal family suffers from sudden memory loss.” They questioned the credibility of the Trump family’s selective memory.

Doubts About Ivanka Trump’s Honesty

Other users shared this skepticism, with one saying, “I doubt anyone expected her to suddenly erupt with honesty.” Another user questioned why Ivanka was put on the witness stand, claiming she was just “a pretty face distracting them usually helps when you are committing fraud.” One user said, “Interesting that she can vividly recall how “Rosemary” was so nice to her and friendly and all that but cannot remember any details about loans and contracts with that bank.”

Defending the Trump Family

Supporters of the Trump family have been vocal about defending them. One user said, “Taking out a loan and paying it back is now fraud. The insanity of the left never fails to amaze me.” This defense suggests that Trump supporters believe the family’s financial activities were entirely above board and legitimate.

Comparisons to Donald Trump Senior

Commenters have drawn parallels between Ivanka Trump’s testimony and the behavior of her father, Donald Trump, especially regarding memory inconsistencies. They said, “So much memory loss they learned from daddy tRump. What is strange is Daddy Trump’s memory comes back in full force on Truth Scamble and when he is not under oath!”

Questioning the Validity of Fraud Claims

There’s been debate about the fundamental nature of the fraud claims against the Trumps. Some people have questioned the legitimacy of these allegations, asking, “How is there fraud when there were no victims? Trump borrowed the money and then repaid it. How is that fraud ?” They argue that since the loans were fully repaid, the accusations of fraud are not legitimate.

Criticism of Donald Trump’s Idolization

Critics have voiced concerns about Donald Trump’s influence and the devotion he inspires among his followers. One critic harshly dubbed him “The Apricot PolPot.” They said he “is a terrible idol to worship. The MAGA cult requires deprogramming in the form of multiple Dump and his minions’ convictions.”